IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support (Дания - Тендер #43232370) | ||
| ||
| Для перевода текста тендера на нужный язык воспользуйтесь приложением: | ||
Страна: Дания (другие тендеры и закупки Дания) Организатор тендера: Energinet Systemansvar A/S Номер конкурса: 43232370 Дата публикации: 28-06-2023 Источник тендера: Единая система закупок Европейского союза TED |
||
Procurement of Electricity Market Modelling Software
Reference number: 23/06793 - 336331The Contracting Authority wants to purchase Electricity Market Modelling Software.
Energinet is relaying on electricity market forecasts as the foundation for any analysis, business case, electricity adequacy, budgeting, and other studies. Making qualified guesses on future elec-tricity prices, emissions, constraints, and market dynamics through simulations is therefore of great importance for Energinet.
Energinet does this through market models, that can simulate a wide range of possible future European energy systems (electricity, heat, and hydrogen) on an hourly basis. The needs for Ener-ginet include a State-of-the-art electricity market model with the ability to handle sector coupling, i.e., gas, hydrogen, and heat. State-of-the-art is defined by market models able to handle complex international studies, such as ERAA22 and TYNDP22, while also having capabilities to simulate hydro power through water value calculation algorithms.
The Contracting Authority wants to purchase Electricity Market Modelling Software.
Energinet is relaying on electricity market forecasts as the foundation for any analysis, business case, electricity adequacy, budgeting, and other studies. Making qualified guesses on future electricity prices, emissions, constraints, and market dynamics through simulations is therefore of great importance for Energinet.
Energinet does this through market models, that can simulate a wide range of possible future European energy systems (electricity, heat, and hydrogen) on an hourly basis. The needs for Energinet include a State-of-the-art electricity market model with the ability to handle sector coupling, i.e., gas, hydrogen, and heat. State-of-the-art is defined by market models able to handle complex international studies, such as ERAA22 and TYNDP22, while also having capabilities to simulate hydro power through water value calculation algorithms.
As Energinet will have users using the model on a day-to-day basis as well as users with more moderate needs, a flexible user access structure is needed. The wide range of user types also demands for an intuitive and logical Graphical User Interface (GUI) so that users quickly can get familiar with the model and themselves input data, run simulations, and access results. Results from the market model should be a wide array of detailed data relevant to the energy system, e.g., flows, prices generation, emissions, adequacy indicators, water values.
The model needs to be suitable for implementation and running on private cloud (or on-premises) solutions. The underlying data and databases will be available for Energinet users only. Energinet should be able to backup, store and restore databases up to 10 years back in time – meaning that the supplier must provide solutions so that this can be achieved. After end of contract a view-only mode should be available for Energinet, so that any archived databases can be restored with all input- and output data.
For further details concerning the purchase, reference is made to the Tender Documents.
If more than 3 applicants fulfill the minimum requirements, cf. section III, the Contracting Authority will prequalify the 3 applicants who are evaluated as most qualified for the specific tendered assignment. Only these applicants will be invited to submit a tender. The selection of the applicants will be based on the relevance of the submitted references, cf. the scope stated in section II.2.4, and the extent to which the references overall demonstrate comprehensive experience with deliveries comparable to the tendered assignment regarding solution, complexity and scope, especially concerning:
• The model has been used in ENTSO-E projects such as Ten Year Network Development Plan, European Resource Adequacy Assessment (previously Midterm Adequacy Forecast) and Seasonal Outlooks, either by ENTSO-E or by a TSO. This can be both as the published tool or as a benchmarking tool used in the alignment process.
• The model is used by European TSOs, with more relevance given to TSOs located in similar part of the European system as Denmark (i.e. Northern Europe).
Please note that this is a negotiated procedure. With the exception of mandatory parts, the Tender Documents may as a result undergo changes as part of the negotiation process.
The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B: “Economic and financial standing” with information from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators:
1. Equity (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.)
2. Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals.
If the applicant is relying on the capacities of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a subcontractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g. a consortium) the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities, cf. section VI.3 “Additional information”. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to secure that the minimum level(s) of standards required are reached on the basis of consolidation when the applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g. a consortium).
Minimum level(s) of standards possibly required:Concerning 1: Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least DKK 750.000.
Concerning 2: Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds DKK 25 mio.
The applicant can inclue the up to 3 most comparable and relevant references undertaken in the past three (3) years as part of the application. The references must be stated in the ESPD part IV.C: “Technical and professional ability”. Undertaken in the past three (3) years implies that the reference must not have been completed prior to the date reached when counting 3 years backwards from the submission date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration. References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the application, but if this is the case, the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been delivered, and this may affect the evaluation of the applicant, cf. section II.2.9.
The references should include:
• A specific description of the work performed for each reference, including:
• The model described in the reference must be used by a European TSO (Transmission System Operator) or the ENTSO-E (European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electrici-ty) at the current time (deadline for submission of application).Contract value (if possible)
• Contact information for the entity in question (including contact person)
• Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year)
If more then 3 Envisaged number of candidates are fulfills the above specification, the 3 most collectible candidates will be chosen, based on the most comparable conditions in the references in relation to this tender.
Any ambiguities and/or incomprehensibilities concerning the above information may have a negative effect on the selection of candidates, cf. section II.2.9. Please note the “description” box can contain more text than is visible. I.e. it is possible to copy paste text into the box.
If the applicant is relying on the references of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a subcontractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g. a consortium) the information for the ESPD part IV.C must also be given in a separate ESPD from each of these entities.
The number of references should not surpass a maximum of the 3 most comparable and relevant references. If the applicant is relying on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent or sister company or a subcontractor) or the applicant is a group of economic operators (e.g. a consor-tium) the maximum number of references to be submitted must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when combined. If more than 3 references are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the 3 most recent references determined by date of final delivery (in this case not yet finished references will not be included).
Minimum level(s) of standards possibly required:It is required as a minimum that the applicant includes at least 2 references, where both require-ments are included in the same reference.
The model described in the reference must be used by a European TSO (Transmission System Operator) or the ENTSO-E (European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity) at the current time (deadline for submission of application).
The information is stated in the Tender Documents.
The information is stated in the Tender Documents.
No special legal form is required.
If the agreements are awarded to a group of economic operators (e.g. a consortium) the partici-pants are required to undertake joint and several liabilities and to appoint one economic operator to represent the group.
The information is stated in the Tender Documents.
Please note that this is a negotiated procedure. With the exception of mandatory parts, the Tender Documents may as a result undergo changes as part of the negotiation process.
Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.
Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publi-cation date);
2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the ten-derers in question, that the contracting authority has entered into a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing sys-tem, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.
3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the can-didates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant rea-sons for the decision.
Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.
Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publi-cation date);
2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the ten-derers in question, that the contracting authority has entered into a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing sys-tem, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.
3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the can-didates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant rea-sons for the decision.
Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen